Blog

La Recherche Article: The microbes accelerating glacier melting

I recently published an article in French pop-sci magazine La Recherche about the wondrous microbial ecosystems on glaciers and ice sheets (here for French speakers). For those English speakers who do not subscribe to la Recherche, here is a translation.

Also, I strongly recommend the excellent translator who worked on this article with me – contact me if you need translation services and I can link you up.

The microbes accelerating glacier melting

Context

Our planet is getting warmer and losing its ice. Mountain glaciers are disappearing and the great Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are shrinking. These masses of ice are giant coolers for the planet and they reflect energy from the Sun back out into space, meaning the smaller they become, the more the planet warms. Surprisingly, the process of melting the vast glaciers and ice sheets is accelerated by microscopic life.

Glacier and ice sheet melting depends upon more than just temperature. Most of the energy driving melt comes from sunlight that hits the ice surface. Dirtier, darker ice absorbs more solar energy than clean, bright ice meaning more energy is available to drive melting. On the Greenland Ice Sheet in particular, the ice becomes very dark in the summer, with large areas reflecting just 20-30% of the sunlight hitting them. This is not a new phenomenon – in fact it was noticed by explorers during the great polar expeditions of the late 1800s. Intrigued, they examined samples of ice under their microscopes. The dark colour of the ice was not simply due to dust as they expected – astonishingly, the ice was stained by life (Nordenskjold, 1875). The ice surface is a patchwork of greys, reds and purples coloured by the collective effect of countless microscopic organisms, with potential knock-on effects for Earth’s climate (Uetake et al., 2010; Takeuchi et al., 2006; Yallop et al., 2012; Cook et al., 2017).

IMGP0267
The dark sediment visible in the 1mx1m quadrat in this picture from the Greenland ice sheet is largely surface algae, along with some mineral grains. This is a particularly heavy patch, sometimes it cannot be seen with the naked eye, but occurred ubiquitously in our numerous study sites.

Microbes on Ice

When explorer Adolf E Nordenskjold arrived on the Greenland Ice Sheet in 1870 he immediately noticed the dark grey-purple colour of the ice. His colleague, a biologist called Berggren, examined the ice under the microscope and discovered a rich variety of microbial life. The importance of their discovery was clear to them – this life darkens the ice and increases its melt rate. Nordenskjold even suggested that the microbial life was the “greatest enemy of the mass of ice” and an accelerator of deglaciation at the global scale (Nordenskjold, 1875)!

Until recently, Nordenskjold’s observations of life on ice have remained obscure footnotes in the history of Polar exploration; however, as climate science has become increasingly urgent in the twenty-first century, Nordenskjold’s work has gained new significance. Contemporary scientists have confirmed the presence of a microbial ecosystem growing on the surface of the Greenland Ice Sheet and elsewhere and are now attempting to quantify their ice-darkening effect. Although it is an extreme environment where temperatures are low and nutrients scarce, there is abundant sunlight and liquid water to support photosynthesis, meaning microalgae can grow on the ice surface (Uetake et al., 2010; Yallop et al., 2012). The days are long in the Arctic in summer, with the sun staying above the horizon for twenty-four hours per day for part of the season, exposing the algae to intense and prolonged solar energy. This powers photosynthesis but over time the exposure stresses the ice algae, causing them to produce biological sunscreen molecules to protect their delicate photosynthetic machinery. These ‘carotenoids’ colour their cells very dark purple and enhance the biological darkening of the ice surface.

At the same time, the ice surface is peppered with holes that are often cylindrical but can have complex and irregular shapes (Cook et al., 2015). These holes range from centimeters to meters in diameter and depth and contain mixtures of biological and nonbiological material bundled up into small balls that sit on the hole floors. Nordenskjold first noticed these holes on the Greenland Ice Sheet and named them ‘cryoconite holes’, from the Greek for ‘holes with frozen dust’. These holes are the most biodiverse microbial habitat on Earth’s ice. They form when dust and debris becomes tangled up by long, thread-like cyanobacteria. The cyanobacteria are photosynthetic and as they grow they exude polymers that act as biological glues, binding the bundles of material together into stable granules. This biological bundling and binding of material creates a microhabitat for other microbes, especially those that can feed on molecules produced by the photosynthesizing cyanobacteria. As the granules grow they become heavier, meaning they settle on the ice surface. The biological material makes them especially dark, so the ice underneath melts quickly, causing holes to form in the ice surface with the granules sitting on the hole floor. The holes provide protection from the weather and intense sunlight and also prevent the microbes from being washed away. The cyanobacteria therefore sculpt the ice surface and engineer a comfortable, stable habitat where diverse microbial life can thrive in this extreme environment.

Cryoconite holes are more than icy buckets that hold microbial life. They are more like microbial mini-cities on ice, with each connected to many others by meltwater flowing between ice crystals just under the ice surface. Cryoconite microbes engage in engineering and construction, production, consumption, competition, predation, growth, reproduction, death, decay, immigration and emigration. There is both import and export of nutrients, waste and other biological material. At the same time, the hole itself changes its shape and size in response to changing environmental conditions with the emergent effect of maintaining the light intensity at the hole floor, promoting photosynthesis (Cook et al., 2010). Algal blooms and cryoconite are crucial components of the wider Arctic ecosystem, acting as stores of carbon (which they draw down from the atmosphere and fix into organic molecules), nutrients and biomass which can all be delivered to soils, rivers and oceans as glaciers melt (Stibal et al., 2012). Truly, these are widely interconnected complex adaptive systems created biologically on Earth’s ice.

gris2
The beautiful cryoconite at S6, Greenland ice sheet

The Cutting Edge of Life on Ice

While life on ice has been known for many years, most of the literature on the subject has been produced during the twenty-first century. Modern molecular biological techniques have enabled scientists to catalogue the species present in cryoconite and algal blooms, and modern instruments can measure their darkening effect. However, there are several major gaps in our understanding of life on ice. To quantify their effect on ice darkening worldwide, we need a reliable method to map icy microbes at the scale of entire ice sheets. From a biological perspective, we know which organisms live in algal blooms and cryoconite so we must now concentrate on determining how they function and what ecosystem services they might provide that could impact human society.

To estimate the total coverage of life on ice, we must detect it without actually being present to take samples. It is relatively easy to take samples and analyse them in a laboratory to tell if life is present, but doing the same from the air is a different problem. In addition to biological darkening, soots and mineral dusts colour the ice. Also, as the ice melts the crystals change shape and melt water can fill the spaces between them, which in itself changes the way the ice absorbs and reflects solar energy. Disentangling the biological signal from these other darkening processes has proven to be challenging.

However, because the darkening of ice by living cells is due to biological molecules that absorb light at specific wavelengths, we may be able to use the spectrum of reflected light to identify them. Chlorophyll, for example, absorbs red and blue light much more effectively than it absorbs green light (which is why we see leaves as green). For other biological molecules, the peak absorption will be at slightly different wavelengths, and non-biological materials will have their own absorption patterns too. However, while identifying ‘signature spectra’ is simple when only one material is present, it is much more difficult when several species with different light absorbing properties are mixed with non-biological materials. All of the light absorbers can be scattered unevenly and mixed vertically within the volume of ice which can itself be a complex aggregate of variously sized ice crystals and liquid water. The reflected light is a tangle of signals that can be hard to unpick.

At our laboratory at the University of Sheffield, we are working on a purpose-built drone which will fly back and forth over a patch of the Greenland Ice Sheet taking images at specific wavelengths of light. By analysing these images we hope to be able to produce a map of life on ice. Using the drone means we can follow the flight on foot and take ground samples to examine in the laboratory, enabling us to link the drone images to actual concentrations of different light absorbers on the ground. The wavelengths imaged by the drone match up with those measured by several Earth observation satellites, meaning that achieving life-detection using a drone should then enable the same from space.

The Rolex Awards for Enterprise Joseph Cook, 2016  Laureate
UAV flights in Svalbard (ph. Marc Latzel/Rolex)

As well as knowing where the life is, we also need a deeper understanding of how it functions. Recognition of ice surfaces as microbial habitats came at the same time as an explosion in accessible and affordable techniques in field molecular microbial ecology, meaning several groups have used high-throughput sequencing of marker-genes to identify the particular microbes present within cryoconite communities (e.g. Cameron et al., 2012; Edwards et al., 2014; Stibal et al., 2014, 2015). Environmental genomic techniques have also been used to investigate the total genetic composition of cryoconite communities (Edwards et al., 2013). To date, these have been snapshot studies, but in the very near future great insights into the functioning of cryoconite microbes will come from rapid metagenomic, metabolomic and metatranscriptomic studies. It has been suggested that ice surface microbes might be good targets for bioprospecting. Since they are able to thrive in conditions of low temperature, high light and low nutrients, they may well utilize survival strategies that we can exploit, either by extracting novel genes and biomolecules, or by observing and gaining ecological knowledge. Cryoconite has been suggested to be a potential source of antifreeze proteins, novel antibiotics and cold-active enzymes. The shape, illumination conditions and flushing with flowing meltwater make cryoconite holes natural analogs to industrial bioreactors which are commonly used to synthesise valuable biomolecules (Cook et al., 2015).

Deep insights will come from combining the expertise of microbial ecologists with glaciologists and physicists who, together, will link processes operating at the molecular level with changes in ice surface colour and patterns of melt, which suggests insights into the ecology of ice surfaces might one day be obtainable from the sky or from space. While this is some way off, great insights could be gained from a shift towards a holistic understanding of the ice surface as a ‘living landscape’.

Extraterrestrial Ice

We are working hard to achieve remote detection of life on ice for the purposes of mapping biological ice darkening from satellites and improving our ability to predict future ice melt. However, there is another potential outcome from this work… what if instead of looking down from space at our own planet, we turn the sensors around and start looking out?

The Greenland Ice Sheet is, in many ways, a good place for developing life detection technologies that can be applied to the search for life on other icy planets and moons. Take, for example, Europa. A recently funded NASA project will examine this icy moon of Jupiter for signs of life because of its potentially habitable icy shell and subsurface ocean. On Europa, the icy surface is sunlit and seeded with possibly mineral-rich snow that forms when liquid water in its subsurface oceans escapes via huge geysers (Hand et al., 2017). There is therefore a potentially dusty ice surface illuminated by sunlight that could support photosynthesis, just like the Greenland Ice Sheet (although the solar energy flux and temperature is lower on Europa and photosynthesis is highly unlikely). Any life detection technology that works on the Greenland Ice Sheet will have to overcome the challenges of ice optics, interference by mineral dusts and uncertain biological pigment composition, which would also be the main challenges for remote detection of life on the surface of other icy planets and moons. The frontiers of glacier biology on Earth may therefore intersect with the cutting edge search for extraterrestrial life.

uav_camp

Summary

While many people think of Arctic and Antarctic ice as lifeless places, there is in fact abundant microbial activity on Earth’s glaciers and ice sheets. But more surprising is the huge impacts of these tiny organisms. By changing the colour of the ice surface, microbes are potentially enhancing the rate at which glaciers and ice sheets are shrinking, but we cannot yet build them into our climate models. The research priority now is mapping these ecosystems from space because this will enable us to estimate their impact on ice melt worldwide and improve our melt forecasts. The same technologies that will enable us to detect life on Earth may eventually be useful tools for searching for icy life elsewhere in the universe. There is also much to be learned about way these microbes function that can educate us about the limits of life in extreme environments. The true sharp edge of glacier biology research involves understanding how these microbes are able to sense, survive and drive environmental change. The study of life on Earth’s ice is deeply interdisciplinary and ultimately it requires us to recognize – as Nordenskjold did – the intricate bridges joining the very big and the very small.

 

References

Cameron K, Hodson A J, Osborn M (2012) Carbon and nitrogen biogeochemical cycling potentials of supraglacial cryoconite communities. Polar Biology, 35: 1375-1393

Cook J, Hodson A, Telling J, Anesio A, Irvine-Fynn T, Bellas C (2010) The mass-area relationship within cryoconite holes and its implications for primary production. Annals of Glaciology, 51 (56): 106-110

Cook, J.M., Edwards, A., Irvine-Fynn, T.D.I., Takeuchi, N. 2015. Cryoconite: Dark biological secret of the Cryosphere. Progress in Physical Geography, 40 (1): 66 -111, doi: 10.1177/0309133315616574Cook et al., 2017

Edwards A, Pachebat J A, Swain M, Hegarty M, Hodson A, Irvine-Fynn T D L, Rassner S M, Sattler B (2013) A metagenomic snapshot of taxonomic and functional diversity in an alpine glacier cryoconite ecosystem. Environmental Research Letters, 8 (035003): 11pp

Edwards A, Mur L, Girdwood S, Anesio A, Stibal M, Rassner S, Hell K, Pachebat J, Post B, Bussell J, Cameron S, Griffith G, Hodson A (2014) Coupled cryoconite ecosystem structure-function relationships are revealed by comparing bacterial communities in Alpine and Arctic glaciers. FEMS Microbial Ecology, 89 (2): 222-237

Hand, K.P., Murray, A.E., Garvin, J.B., Brinckerhoff, W.B., Christner, B.C., Edgett, K.S., Ehlmann, B.L., German, C.R., Hayes, A.G., Hoehler, T.M., Horst, S.M., Lunine, J.I., Nealson, H.H., Paranicas, C., Schmidt, B.E., Smith, D.E., Rhoden, A.R., Russell, M.J., Templeton, A.S., Willis, P.A., Yingst, R.A., Phillips, C.B., Cable, M.L., Craft, K.L., Hofmann, A.E., Nordheim, T.A., Pappalardo, R.P., and the Project Engineering Team (2017). NASA, Report of the Europa Lander Science Definition team. Posted Feb 2017. https://solarsystem.nasa.gov/docs/Europa_Lander_SDT_Report_2016.pdf

Stibal M, Sabacka M, Zarsky J (2012a) Biological processes on glacier and ice sheet surfaces. Nature 1554 Geoscience, 5: 771-774

Stibal M, Schostag M, Cameron K A, Hansen L H, Chandler D M, Wadham J L, Jacobsen C S (2014) Different 1558 bulk and active microbial communities in cryoconite from the margin and interior of the Greenland ice 1559 sheet. Environmental Microbiology Reports, DOI: 10.1111/1758-2229.12246

Stibal, M., Schostag, M., Cameron, K. A., Hansen, L. H., Chandler, D. M., Wadham, J. L. and Jacobsen, C. S. (2015), Different bulk and active bacterial communities in cryoconite from the margin and interior of the Greenland ice sheet. Environmental Microbiology Reports, 7: 293–300. doi:10.1111/1758-2229.12246

Takeuchi, N., Dial, R., Kohshima, S., Segawa, T., Uetake, J., 2006. Spatial distribution and abundance of red snow algae on 35 the Harding Icefield, Alaska derived from a satellite image. Geophysical Research Letters, 33, L21502, doi:10.1029/2006GL027819

Uetake, J., Naganuma, T., Hebsgaard, M. B., and Kanda, H. 2010. Communities of algae and cyanobacteria on glaciers in west Greenland. Polar Sci. 4, 71–80. doi: 10.1016/j.polar.2010.03.002

Yallop, M.L., Anesio, A.J., Perkins, R.G., Cook, J., Telling, J., Fagan, D., MacFarlane, J., Stibal, M., Barker, G., Bellas, C., 25 Hodson, A., Tranter, M., Wadham, J., Roberts, N.W. 2012. Photophysiology and albedo-changing potential of the ice-algal community on the surface of the Greenland ice sheet, ISME Journal, 6: 2302 – 2313

 

Advertisements

Pitching Tents on Ice

In 2017 I slept in various ice-camps in Greenland in spring, summer and autumn. Living on ice requires some specialist techniques different to camping on dry land, and they vary depending on the season. In summer, the main problem is the melting surface. A tent pitched directly on the ice surface will descend into a wet ditch because of the heat generated by a person inside. To counter this, tents are pitched on sheets of ply with reflective insulating sheets underneath. These slow the ablation under the tents and provide a flat surface to sleep on; however, they often work too well and leave the tents wobbling on raised platforms after a few days.

greenland-2016-day-7-051
A recently repitched tent sitting next to the platform left behind in its previous position (Greenland Ice Sheet, July 2016)

The most important thing is securing the tent to the ice surface, because it can get very windy on the ice sheet. The ice surface can descend several centimetres per day, meaning short stakes or pins will melt out very fast. For that reason long bamboo or plastic poles are drilled up to 1 metre into the ice at an oblique angle under the tent, providing points to secure the tents to. This is especially important for geodesic dome tents, where tension is required roughly evenly across the poles for the tent to keep its shape. In 2017 the combination of strong winds and very fast surface lowering meant the large mess tent quickly became raised above the surrounding ice and, despite our best repitching efforts, the poles floated freely above the ice. With no ground to push against, the poles became structureless and weak and eventually collapsed.

IMGP4334
Drilling holes for 1m bamboo stakes to secure the tent-tags and extra guy-lines in a summer storm (Greenland, 2017)

In winter, a stronger and more permanent solution can be achieved using Abalykov threads. These are loops of tape or rope frozen into the ice itself. There is no surface melting in autumn/winter and the surface does not have a weak weathered layer. The strong, cold surface ice is perfect for drilling obliquely with short ice screws so that two drill-holes meet 10-15cm below the ice surface an create a tunnel from the surface and back. A pipe-cleaner can then be used to drag rope or tape through the hole and tie the tent down. the hole can then be packed with snow or water which will quickly refreeze around the rope and form a super strong tie-point to secure the tent. Using a snow shovel to cover the tent’s snow-skirt with snow helps prevent wind and snow from getting between the flysheet and the inner, keeping it cosy inside and helping to keep the tent a bit better streamlined against the wind.

This Youtube clip posted by Glenmore Lodge (Scotland) explains how to make an Abalykov thread for ice-climbing – it’s the same for securing tents in an ice camp.

The Abalykov threads stood up to extremely strong winds in Greenland in September/October. The poles and fabric seemed more at risk of failure than the threads!

Lenovo T470p Ubuntu 16.04 Install notes

Here’s some notes on installing Ubuntu alongside Windows on a fresh Lenovo t470p with Windows 10 preinstalled. It took a bit of trial and error for me so hopefully these notes will help someone trying to do the same.

1.Download Ubuntu ISO

The Ubuntu ISO image for your system architecture is available here: https://www.ubuntu.com/download/desktop. Download to your PC. It needs to be put onto a CD or USB that can be booted from, requiring some software. I used Universal USB Installer https://www.pendrivelinux.com/universal-usb-installer-easy-as-1-2-3.

2. Create bootable USB

Find an empty USB drive with enough space (>2GB). Open Universal USB Installer, select the downloaded Ubuntu ISO image and the destination drive (the USB) and UUI formatting and click ‘Create’.

3. Prepare partition

In Windows, find the disk manager (>dskmgmt in windows command line) and select C: drive. Right click and select ‘shrink volume’. Reduce the size of the volume by the desired amount. I left Windows with 80 GB of space, leaving 420 for Ubuntu. Once this is done, a new partition will be visible, labelled ‘unallocated’. This is where Ubuntu will sit eventually, so check you have allocated enough space.

4. Restart laptop and access boot menu

With the bootable USB containing the Ubuntu ISO inserted, restart the laptop and hold down F12 (star icon) to access the boot menu. The boot menu shows options of drives to boot from, with the top one being Windows Boot Manager. Select the UUI USB option. A ‘live’ boot of Ubuntu will run from the USB stick.

20171116_134812

5. Install Ubuntu

From inside the live Ubuntu, the installer should auto-run. If not, there is a desktop icon for the installer that you can select. The install wizard is pretty self explanatory. I opted not to install any third party software, but otherwise maintained all the defaults. Select a username and password and choose a timezone, then click through to the end.

6. Restart

The final option on the installer is to restart. You have no choice but to do this, so do it. For me, the system booted straight into windows. I tried to rectify this by accessing the boot menu again using F12 (star). Although Ubuntu was visible and was the priority boot, selecting it just hung the system and I was forced to either boot Windows or Ubuntu from the USB rather than the full install. This is because the BIOS setting defaults to UEFI only, which is protected by Windows’s Secure Boot setting.

20171116_134644

7. Restart into BIOS

To access the settings, press F1 during startup. Navigate to the ‘security’ tab and find the option to disable secure boot. Then navigate to the ‘startup’ tab and find the option for ‘UEFI/Legacy BIOS’. Change the setting from ‘UEFI only’ to ‘Both’. Save and exit.

20171116_13495520171116_13504220171116_135012

8. Restart

Now on restarting the laptop, it will boot straight intop Ubuntu by default, with Windows accessible in its small partition by selecting the Windows Boot Manager from the boot screen, accessed by holding F12 during startup.

20171116_135202

9. Test and go!

So far, Ubuntu 16.04 LTS has run very well ‘out of the box’ on the Lenovo t470p, with no major hardware issues encountered so far. The Wifi is working fine. I’ve heard the fingerprint scanner might not work great, but I’m not really interested in that anyway.

Q&A: St Laurence Jr School, Ramsgate

The Year 6 Students at St Laurence Junior School in Ramsgate are lucky enough to be studying “Extreme Earth”, so I visited to talk about Earth’s extreme cold. Two of the students wrote a report about it here. We talked about different types of ice (ice sheets, glaciers and sea ice), climate change and how/why scientists live in the Arctic. We even had volunteer yr6 polar explorers dressed up ready for an Arctic expedition! Yesterday, I was delighted to receive a bundle of letters from the students with some extra questions that didn’t get asked in class – so here are my answers….

Q: Do you have a spare tent in case one breaks?

A: Yes, we try to have spares of everything because you never know what might happen in an Arctic camp, and there are no shops to go and buy replacements. In summer 2017, our tent was destroyed by a storm so the spare came in very useful!

20170719_042443
Our broken tent!

Q: How much equipment do you own?

A: Quite a lot, but working in the Arctic means there is a lot of wear and tear on the equipment. It always needs to be in good working condition, so lots of things only last for a few years. Often the equipment is not owned by scientists, but is owned by a university or whoever funds the project.

Q: What is your favourite part of your job?

A: This is a really tough question. I really love working in remote, cold places because it is beautiful and challenging, but I also love the other parts of my job like computer programming, writing papers and articles, analysing data, and talking to students. Most polar scientists spend less than 20% of their time actually working in the ice and snow, so they have to learn to love all the other things too. I think that’s true of most cool-looking jobs.

IMGP4334

Q: Do your friends think you have a cool job?

A: Some do, and others don’t. Some people really hate the cold or don’t like the idea of being away from home comforts for long periods of time. Others don’t like the idea of working for a university. But mostly, yes, people think it’s quite cool.

Q: Where are you going next?

A: My next trip will be to New Orleans (USA) to talk to other scientists at a big meeting in December. After that, I’ll be going to Svalbard (Arctic Norway) in the spring. Then it depends how much funding I can find!

Q: Do you enjoy your job?

A: Yes!

Q: How long is the journey from here to Greenland?

A: We have to fly from the UK to either Copenhagen (Denmark) or Reykjavik (Iceland) and then get another flight from there to Greenland. There are several places to fly to in Greenland but often people go to Kangerlussuaq. There we take a helicopter to our field site, or if we want to work near the edge of the ice, we can trek in and camp.

gris1
Dr Irvine-Fynn: out of the helicopter and onto the ice…

Q: How many people are in your team?

A: It changes for each project, but normally between 3 and 8 people. Less than three is not very safe, but more than 8 is awkward for cooking and keeping a well-ordered camp. There is also a limit on the number of people that can be squished into a helicopter, and it is usually too expensive to do repeated flights.

Q:  Will you ever quit?

A: Maybe! I really love doing this job at the moment, and I’d like to keep doing it. However, one of the downsides is that it is not very secure, and once my current contract runs out in 2019 I’m not sure what opportunities will be out there, so I’m totally open to looking outside of academia for the next challenge.

Q: What was your worst adventure?

A: We once had an eventful field season involving illness, broken equipment, arguing team mates and a car crash that was not very much fun!

Q:Have you ever found animal DNA in the ice?

A: Cool question – one of the things I’ve been working on is the microbiology of glaciers and ice sheets. One of the most useful tools we have to do this is gene sequencing, because by looking at the genes we can tell which microbes live in the ice. In class people were interested to hear whether I’d found any woolly mammoth, dinosaurs or UFO’s and I’m afraid I haven’t seen evidence of those in DNA extracts either.

tardi 3
This is one of the microscopic creatures found in ice – it’s called a Tardigrade or ‘water bear’ or ‘moss piglet’. They scurry around eating algae! Ph from “Eye of Science”

Q: What food do you eat in the Arctic?

A: We cook on a gas stove and what we eat depends how long we are there for. In a one-week camp we might eat pouches of dehydrated food most nights because it is easy to make and compresses down for transport. For a longer field camp it is important to be well-nourished so we take more care to eat a more balanced diet. This is typically dried pasta, rice, spaghetti or instant mashed potato with tinned vegetables, tinned fish or maybe some cured meat. Some things can be kept cold by burying them in the ice.

Q: How much do you get paid a week?

A: This is a very common question and, while I’m not giving out a number, I do think it’s important to point out that this is not a job to choose if making money is a main motivation. If, however, life experience, challenge and positive impact are your main motivators, then it might be a really good choice.

Q: What is the scariest thing you’ve done on the ice? 

A: In September this year we explored a system of ice caves by abseiling in. As we were preparing to go in for the first time we knocked a piece of ice in to see how deep the cavern was – it took a full 7 seconds to hit the bottom, and when it did it made a huge echoing BOOM that told us it was very deep and very big! It wasn’t really scary, but it was really exciting!

Q: What is the coldest temperature you have experienced?

A: In Svalbard last winter we were working in -35 degrees. It was very difficult to do fiddly work on drones and other science kit because as soon as you take the big mittens off your hands go numb, even with thinner gloves on!

Q: What do you miss when you go away?

A: I miss my wife – Kylie – and my cat – Shackleton – like crazy!  And I miss food like fresh fruit and vegetables, fresh bread etc. But honestly, once I’m back on dry land I immediately miss living in a tent on the ice!

Thanks for all the questions! Best of luck with your Extreme Earth topic!

Greenland Aurora

Camping on the ice sheet in September/October was a new experience – I’d never seen darkness on the ice before! The lack of light pollution and cloud-free skies made for a truly spectacular display of the Northern Lights. It was -25C and 35 knot winds pretty much constantly, so it was a constant battle between wanting to get into a tent and warm up and not wanting to miss a second of watching the aurora dancing over the milky way, with passing satellites and the occasional shooting star.

While on a personal level this was an incredible treat, it also presented some pretty major challenges for working with drones on the ice. The aurora knocked out the radio communications linking our drones to their controllers, meaning they could only be controlled over local wifi, reducing their range from a few hundred metres to about 30!

Inspired by a recent twitter exchange about this I bought Melanie Windridge’s book “Aurora” & thoroughly recommend it!

EGU Image of the Week: Algal blooms on GrIS

A short article I wrote for the EGU blog about biological darkening of ice and snow was posted last month. The article was built around an aerial view of our 2016 field camp on the Greenland Ice Sheet, where large areas of dark ice are clearly visible.

DJI_0034-1600x1200
Aerial view of the field camp in July 2016

The dark colour is due to a collection of dusts, soot and algal cells, with the algal cells doing the bulk of the darkening. A second figure in the article shows the algal cells under the microscope along with the spectra of reflected light from the algal ice surfaces. This was one of several EGU blog posts about icy biology, including this one and this one!